York v. Hamer

132 So. 186, 100 Fla. 1591
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 5, 1931·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted. to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the orders herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there are no errors in the said orders; it is therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said orders of the circuit court be, and the same are hereby, affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

York v. Hamer, 132 So. 186, 100 Fla. 1591 (Fla. 1931).

132 So. 186 (York v. Hamer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Burch
545 So. 2d 279 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Linehan v. State
476 So. 2d 1262 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Bunnell v. State
453 So. 2d 808 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Duke v. State
185 So. 422 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)