Duke v. State
This text of 182 So. 277 (Duke v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
In this cause Mr. Chief Justice ELLIS, Mr. Justice BUFORD and Mr. Justice CHAPMAN are of the opinion that the judgment of the Circuit Court herein should *Page 866
be affirmed while Mr. Justice WHITFIELD, Mr. Justice TERRELL and Mr. Justice BROWN, are of the opinion that the said judgment should be reversed for a new trial. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the judgment should be affirmed, therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State, ex rel. Hampton, v. McClung,
Affirmed.
ELLIS, C.J., and WHITFIELD, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD and CHAPMAN, J.J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
182 So. 277, 132 Fla. 865, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duke-v-state-fla-1938.