Yoh v. Schlachter

Ohio Supreme Court

Yoh v. Schlachter

2001 Ohio 183, 92 Ohio St. 3d 234

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 11, 2001

Docket2000-0824

StatusPublished

This text of 2001 Ohio 183 (Yoh v. Schlachter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yoh v. Schlachter, 2001 Ohio 183, 92 Ohio St. 3d 234 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 92 Ohio St.3d 234.]

YOH, ADMR., APPELLANT, v. SCHLACHTER ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Yoh v. Schlachter, 2001-Ohio-183.] Workers’ compensation—Subrogation right of statutory subrogee against third party—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and cause remanded to trial court for further proceedings on authority of Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co. (No. 00-824—Submitted June 20, 2001—Decided July 11, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Williams County, No. WM-99-008. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings on the authority of Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co. (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 115, 748 N.E.2d 1111. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. COOK, J., dissents. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents. RESNICK, J., not participating. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinions of Chief Justice Moyer and Justice Cook in Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co. (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 115, 135-142, 748 N.E.2d 1111, 1128-1135. __________________ Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, L.L.P., and Jack G. Fynes, for appellant. Millisor & Nobil Co., L.P.A., Michael J. Reidy and Jill C. Boland, for appellee. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 92 Ohio St.3d 234.]

YOH, ADMR., APPELLANT, v. SCHLACHTER ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Yoh v. Schlachter, 2001-Ohio-183.] Workers’ compensation—Subrogation right of statutory subrogee against third party—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and cause remanded to trial court for further proceedings on authority of Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co. (No. 00-824—Submitted June 20, 2001—Decided July 11, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Williams County, No. WM-99-008. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings on the authority of Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co. (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 115, 748 N.E.2d 1111. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. COOK, J., dissents. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents. RESNICK, J., not participating. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinions of Chief Justice Moyer and Justice Cook in Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co. (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 115, 135-142, 748 N.E.2d 1111, 1128-1135. __________________ Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, L.L.P., and Jack G. Fynes, for appellant. Millisor & Nobil Co., L.P.A., Michael J. Reidy and Jill C. Boland, for appellee. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2001 Ohio 183, 92 Ohio St. 3d 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yoh-v-schlachter-ohio-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack