Yetman v. State
290 S.W.3d 182, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1151, 2009 WL 2437824
Opinion
ORDER
Jason Yetman appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion, which sought to vacate the judgment entered on his guilty plea. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Yetman v. State, 290 S.W.3d 182, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1151, 2009 WL 2437824 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
290 S.W.3d 182 (Yetman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Middaugh v. State
290 S.W.3d 182 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)