Middaugh v. State

290 S.W.3d 182, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1161, 2009 WL 2437826
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 11, 2009
DocketWD 69902
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 290 S.W.3d 182 (Middaugh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Middaugh v. State, 290 S.W.3d 182, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1161, 2009 WL 2437826 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Patrick Middaugh appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the circuit court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yetman v. State
290 S.W.3d 182 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
290 S.W.3d 182, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1161, 2009 WL 2437826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/middaugh-v-state-moctapp-2009.