Yeomans v. Heath

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Yeomans v. Heath

70 N.E. 1114, 185 Mass. 189, 1904 Mass. LEXIS 780

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedFebruary 26, 1904

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 70 N.E. 1114 (Yeomans v. Heath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yeomans v. Heath, 70 N.E. 1114, 185 Mass. 189, 1904 Mass. LEXIS 780 (Mass. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

Knowlton, C. J.

The case as stated in the agreed statement of facts and in the plaintiffs’ declaration is within the St. 1890, c. 437, but is not within the law as amended by St. 1901, c. 459. This amendment deprived the plaintiffs of the right of recovery which they previously had. The case is covered by the decision in Wilson v. Head, 184 Mass. 515.

[190]*190Assuming, as we must for the purpose of this decision, that the agreed statement of facts correctly presents the case, the entry should be,

Judgment for the defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knowlton, C. J.

The case as stated in the agreed statement of facts and in the plaintiffs’ declaration is within the St. 1890, c. 437, but is not within the law as amended by St. 1901, c. 459. This amendment deprived the plaintiffs of the right of recovery which they previously had. The case is covered by the decision in Wilson v. Head, 184 Mass. 515.

[190]*190Assuming, as we must for the purpose of this decision, that the agreed statement of facts correctly presents the case, the entry should be,

Judgment for the defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 N.E. 1114, 185 Mass. 189, 1904 Mass. LEXIS 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yeomans-v-heath-mass-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack