YellowCake, Inc. v. DashGo, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided July 25, 2023·No. 1:21-cv-00803·Unknown

Opinion

1 Thomas P. Griffin, Jr., Esq. (SBN 155133) HEFNER, STARK & MAROIS, LLP 2 2150 River Plaza Drive, Suite 450 3 Sacramento, CA 95833 Telephone: (916) 925-6620 4 Facsimile: (916) 925-1127 Email: tgriffin@hsmlaw.com 5

6 Seth L. Berman, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice) ABRAMS FENSTERMAN, LLP 7 3 Dakota Drive, Suite 300 Lake Success, NY 11042 8 Telephone: (516) 328-2300 9 Facsimile: (516) 328-6638 Email: sberman@abramslaw.com 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff Yellowcake, Inc.

11 Richard J. Idell, Esq. (SBN 069033) 12 Ory Sandel, Esq. (SBN 233204) DICKENSON PEATMAN & FOGARTY P.C. 13 1500 First Street, Suite 200 14 Napa, CA 94559 Telephone: (707) 261-7000 15 Facsimile: (707) 255-6876 Email: ridell@dpf-law.com 16 osandel@dpf-law.com 17 Attorneys for Defendants Dashgo, Inc., Audiomicro, Inc. d.b.a. Adrev, Benjamin Patterson and Noah 18 Becker

19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 YELLOWCAKE, INC., a California CASE NO. 1:21-cv-00803-AWI-BAM corporation, 22 STIPULATION RE: CONTINUANCE OF Plaintiff, TRIAL AND RELATED DATES; 23 v. [PROPOSED] ORDER 24 DASHGO, INC., a Delaware corporation; (E-filing) 25 AUDIOMICRO, INC. d/b/a ADREV, a Hon. Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe, Delaware corporation; BENJAMIN Presiding 26 PATTERSON, an individual; and NOAH BECKER, an individual, 27 Defendants. 28 1 Plaintiff Yellowcake, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Yellowcake”), on the one hand, and defendants 2 Dashgo, Inc. (“Dashgo”), Audiomicro, Inc. d.b.a. Adrev (“Adrev”), Benjamin Patterson and 3 Noah Becker (collectively, “Defendants”), on the other hand (collectively, the “Parties”; each 4 individually, a “Party”), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby agree and stipulate as 5 follows with reference to the following facts: 6 1. On June 9, 2022, the Court issued a Scheduling Order in this action. Docket No. 7 67. 8 2. On February 21, 2023, the Court issued an Amended Scheduling Order in this 9 action. Docket No. 106. 10 3. On May 10, 2023, the Court issued a further Amended Scheduling Order in this 11 action. Docket No. 118. 12 4. According to the May 10, 2023, Amended Scheduling Order (“Schedule”), the 13 following deadlines are currently pending: 14 15 August 31, 2023: Non-Party Discovery and Depositions 16 September 22, 2023: Expert Disclosure 17 October 20, 2023: Supplemental Expert Disclosure 18 November 17, 2023: Expert Discovery Deadline 19 January 26, 2024: Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline 20 July 15, 2024: Pretrial Conference 21 September 17, 2024: Jury Trial 22 5. The May 10, 2023, Amended Scheduling Order provides, in pertinent part: 23 “If the parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot 24 be met, counsel are ordered to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by subsequent status 25 conference. The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a showing of good cause even if the request to modify is 26 made by stipulation. Stipulations extending the deadlines contained herein 27 will not be considered unless they are accompanied by affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate, attached exhibits, which establish good 28 cause for granting the relief requested. The failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.” 1 6. Defendants have issued and served subpoenas for both documents and testimony 2 on each of two third-parties, Colonize Media, Inc. and David Hernandez a.k.a. Jose David 3 Hernandez, and have noticed the depositions of those third parties, as well as the depositions of 4 Plaintiff’s person most knowledgeable and of Plaintiff’s principal, Kevin Berger. Those 5 depositions are currently set for July 25 and 26, 2023 (as to Colonize Media, Inc. and Mr. 6 Hernandez), and August 1 and 2, 2023 (as to Mr. Berger and Plaintiff’s person most 7 knowledgeable). The return date on the document subpoenas to Colonize Media, Inc. and Mr. 8 Hernandez was July 18, 2023. 9 7. The Parties have mutually expressed an agreement to mediate the matter, but only 10 recently have they been able to agree on a mediator and a mediation date. The Parties have now 11 agreed on a mediator and a mediation date. The Parties agree that mediation should occur before 12 any depositions are taken. The meditator is John Bates, Esq. of JAMS. Based on various factors, 13 including without limitation the requirements of Defendants’ insurance carrier, and the 14 15 availability of counsel, the parties and the mediator, the mediation is currently scheduled for 16 October 3, 2023. 17 8. On Friday, July 7, 2023, Thomas P. Griffin, Jr., counsel for Plaintiff, advised 18 defense counsel by email, inter alia, that Mr. Berger is currently overseas and is facing health 19 concerns that prevent him from returning to California as planned; that Mr. Berger’s return date 20 is presently unknown; and that it could be a few weeks before Mr. Berger is permitted to return. 21 Mr. Griffin also informed Defendants’ counsel that he has been addressing medical issues 22 affecting multiple family members which has interfered with his ability to tend to matters in this 23 case, including selecting a mediator and scheduling a mediation. Mr. Griffin also stated that, 24 because of Mr. Berger’s absence, the scheduling of the mediation is on hold; the production of 25 documents by Colonize Media, Inc. and Mr. Hernandez scheduled for July 18, 2023, and the 26 corresponding depositions will need to be reset; and that Plaintiff’s counsel will work with 27 defense counsel to re-set the depositions previously noticed by Defendants. One or more 28 1 declarations attesting to the foregoing shall be filed herewith, and Plaintiff shall provide any 2 further evidence requested by the Court regarding the same. 3 9. In view of the various issues raised by Mr. Griffin, Defendants and Plaintiff are 4 all agreeable to stipulate to a modification of the Schedule and a continuance of the dates for the 5 depositions and document production pursuant to the subpoenas regarding the four above-noted 6 deponents on the terms set forth hereinbelow. 7 NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 8 A. Colonize Media, Inc. and David Hernandez a.k.a. Jose David Hernandez shall 9 produce all documents responsive to Defendants’ document subpoenas on or before 10 August 7, 2023, subject to any objections on the grounds of attorney-client privilege 11 and/or the attorney work product doctrine. Counsel for the parties shall meet and 12 confer in good faith with regard to any issues relating to the scope of the document 13 subpoenas. 14 15 B. The Parties shall mediate this matter on October 3, 2023, with John Bates, Esq. of 16 JAMS. 17 C. If the matter does not settle at mediation, depositions will take place as follows unless 18 otherwise agreed by the Parties: 19 a. The deposition of David Hernandez a.k.a. Jose David Hernandez shall 20 commence on October 23, 2023, at 9:30 a.m. and shall continue on October 21 24, 2023 until completed. 22 b. The deposition of the person(s) most knowledgeable of Colonize Media, Inc. 23 shall commence immediately upon the completion of Mr. Hernandez’s 24 deposition, anticipated to be on October 24, 2023, and shall continue on 25 date(s) agreed up by the Parties. 26 c. The deposition of Kevin Berger shall commence on November 7, 2023, at 27 9:30 a.m. and shall continue on November 8, 2023, at 10:00 a.m., until 28 completed. 1 d. The deposition of the person(s) most knowledgeable of Yellowcake, Inc. 2 shall commence immediately upon the completion of Mr. Berger’s deposition, 3 anticipated to be on November 8, 2023, and shall continue until completed. 4 e. The deposition of Eric Gressinger shall commence on November 13, 2023, at 5 9:30 a.m. and shall continue until completed. 6 f. The deposition of Benjamin Patterson shall commence on November 14, 7 2023, at 9:30 a.m.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

YellowCake, Inc. v. DashGo, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2023).

YellowCake, Inc. v. DashGo, Inc. (YellowCake, Inc. v. DashGo, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.