Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma/Yeargain v. Venable

Yeargain v. Venable

1938 OK CR 113, 84 P.2d 813, 65 Okla. Crim. 226, 1938 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 100
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedNovember 18, 1938
DocketNo. A-9579.
StatusPublished

This text of 1938 OK CR 113 (Yeargain v. Venable) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yeargain v. Venable, 1938 OK CR 113, 84 P.2d 813, 65 Okla. Crim. 226, 1938 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 100 (Okla. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

PEE CURIAM.

The application for writ of mandamus in this case is identical with the application of J. D. Yeargrain, Sr., this date decided by this court. 65 Okla. Cr. 225, 84 P. 2d 812. The only difference being that the writ in this case was asked in reference to a case pending against the defendant in the county court.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in the case of J. D. Yeargain, Sr., the application for writ of mandamus in this case is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yeargain v. Venable
1938 OK CR 112 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1938 OK CR 113, 84 P.2d 813, 65 Okla. Crim. 226, 1938 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yeargain-v-venable-oklacrimapp-1938.