Yavner v. Toal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Yavner v. Toal

294 A.D.2d 244, 741 N.Y.S.2d 867, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5428

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 23, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 294 A.D.2d 244 (Yavner v. Toal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yavner v. Toal, 294 A.D.2d 244, 741 N.Y.S.2d 867, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5428 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton Tingling, J.), entered November 23, 2001, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained in a Rock-land County car accident, denied defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) to change venue from New York County to Rockland County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion was properly denied for failure to show the nature and materiality of the anticipated testimony of the investigating police officer whose convenience defendants promote (see, Morrison v Lawler, 290 AD2d 370; Blake v University of Rochester, 288 AD2d 118). Concur—Williams, P.J., Saxe, Buckley, Rosenberger and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton Tingling, J.), entered November 23, 2001, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained in a Rock-land County car accident, denied defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) to change venue from New York County to Rockland County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion was properly denied for failure to show the nature and materiality of the anticipated testimony of the investigating police officer whose convenience defendants promote (see, Morrison v Lawler, 290 AD2d 370; Blake v University of Rochester, 288 AD2d 118). Concur—Williams, P.J., Saxe, Buckley, Rosenberger and Lerner, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

294 A.D.2d 244, 741 N.Y.S.2d 867, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yavner-v-toal-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack