Ravenna v. Entenmann's Sales Co.

96 A.D.3d 624, 946 N.Y.S.2d 861

This text of 96 A.D.3d 624 (Ravenna v. Entenmann's Sales Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ravenna v. Entenmann's Sales Co., 96 A.D.3d 624, 946 N.Y.S.2d 861 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Laura Douglas, J.), entered March 6, 2012, which, to the extent appealed from, denied the defendants-appellants ’ motion for a change of venue to Rockland County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Two of the drivers involved in a multivehicle accident that oc[625]*625curred in Rockland County commenced actions in Bronx County, properly designating venue on the basis of the residence of one of the parties in the Bronx (CPLR 503 [a]). The motion to change venue of those actions to Rockland County was properly denied since the movants failed to show the nature and materiality of the anticipated testimony of the investigating police officer, or to provide adequate support for their assertion that she would be inconvenienced by having to testify in Bronx County rather than in Rockland County (see Yavner v Toal, 294 AD2d 244 [2002]; Morrison v Lawler, 290 AD2d 370, 370 [2002]). The affidavit of an out-of-state witness who did not indicate that he would provide material testimony also did not warrant a change of venue. Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Moskowitz and Renwick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morrison v. Lawler
290 A.D.2d 370 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Yavner v. Toal
294 A.D.2d 244 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 A.D.3d 624, 946 N.Y.S.2d 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ravenna-v-entenmanns-sales-co-nyappdiv-2012.