Yates, Stanton Wayne
This text of Yates, Stanton Wayne (Yates, Stanton Wayne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-88,958-01 WR-88,958-02 WR-88,958-03 WR-88,958-04 WR-88,958-05
EX PARTE STANTON WAYNE YATES, Applicant
ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. 1525082A, 1525085A, 1525086A, 1525083A, AND 1525084A IN THE 8TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HOPKINS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex
parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). A jury convicted Applicant of four
offenses of organized crime and one offense of burglary of a habitation. It assessed lengthy prison
terms. The convictions were affirmed on direct appeal. See Yates v. State, 505 S.W.3d 631(Tex.
App.—Texarkana 2016). -2-
Applicant raises many claims in his habeas applications, including several claims of
ineffective assistance of trial counsel. He has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief.
Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1999). There is no response from Applicant’s trial counsel in the habeas record provided to this
Court, and there are no findings from the trial court. In these circumstances, additional facts are
needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial
court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact.
The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims of ineffective
assistance by explaining counsel’s representation of Applicant, including applicable strategy and
tactical decisions. To obtain the response, the trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE
CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether
Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court
shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the claims raised
in the habeas applications. The trial court may also make any other findings of fact and conclusions
of law it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claims for habeas corpus
relief.
These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues.
The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be -3-
obtained from this Court.
Filed: October 31,2018 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Yates, Stanton Wayne, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yates-stanton-wayne-texcrimapp-2018.