Stanton Wayne Yates v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 27, 2016
Docket06-16-00010-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Stanton Wayne Yates v. State (Stanton Wayne Yates v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stanton Wayne Yates v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

ACCEPTED 06-16-00009-CR SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 6/27/2016 8:34:28 PM DEBBIE AUTREY CLERK

NO. 06-16-00009-CR FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE TEXARKANA, TEXAS § 6/27/2016 8:34:28 PM VS. § 6th COURT DEBBIE AUTREY § Clerk STANTON YATES § OF APPEALS

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE APPELLANT'S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:

Now comes Stanton Yates, Appellant in the above styled and numbered

cause, and moves this Court to grant an extension of time to file appellant's brief,

pursuant to Rule 38.6 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and for good

cause shows the following:

1. This case is on appeal from the 8th Judicial District Court of Hopkins

County, Texas.

2. The case below was styled the STATE OF TEXAS vs. Stanton Yates,

and numbered 1525082.

3. Appellant was convicted of Engaging in Organized Criminal Activity.

4. Appellant was assessed a sentence of Life on January 14, 2016.

5. Notice of appeal was given on January 15, 2016.

6. The clerk's record was filed on February 25, 2016; the reporter's

record was filed on March 14, 2016. 7. The appellate brief is presently due on June 27, 2016.

8. Appellant requests an extension of time of 7 days from the present

date, i.e. June 27, 2016.

9. Three extensions to file the brief has been received in this cause.

10. Defendant is currently incarcerated.

11. Appellant relies on the following facts as good cause for the requested

extension:

A. Appellant’s attorney’s planned on spending significant time on

preparing and filing Appellant’s brief during the week of January 20, 2016.

However, each of Appellant’s attorney’s 5 children and his wife, a stay-at-home

mom, became ill with a severe stomach virus. This required Appellant’s attorney

to stay home and care for his children and wife much of the week. Also,

Appellant’s attorney contracted the stomach virus and missed several days of

work. Consequently, Appellant’s attorney was able to spend very little time

preparing Appellant’s brief.

B. This is a serious case that involves a severe sentence and all appellate

issues should be given sufficient consideration and time to be developed and

properly briefed on appeal.

D. Although Appellant’s attorney has spent considerable time thus far; he

needs additional time to properly prepare Appellant’s Brief. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant prays that this

Court grant this Motion To Extend Time to File Appellant's Brief, and for such

other and further relief as the Court may deem appropriate.

Respectfully submitted,

Martin Braddy Attorney at Law 121 Oak Avenue Suite A Sulphur Springs, TX 75482 Tel: (903) 885-2040 Fax: (903) 500-2704

By: /s/ Martin Braddy Martin Braddy State Bar No. 00796240 martin.braddy@verizon.net Attorney for Stanton Yates CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on June 15, 2016, a true and correct copy of the above

and foregoing document was served on the District Attorney's Office, Hopkins

County, by electronic service through the Electronic Filing Manager.

/s/ Martin Braddy Martin Braddy

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Stanton Wayne Yates v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stanton-wayne-yates-v-state-texapp-2016.