Yarborough v. State

273 S.W. 842, 100 Tex. Crim. 480, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 535
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 22, 1925·No. No. 8938.·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinions

LATTIMORE, Judge. —

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Houston County of transporting intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary.

We find in the record a motion on the part of the State’s Attorney to dismiss the appeal because of the fact that the caption does not state the date of the adjournment of the trial court. An examination of the record reveals the fact that the motion is well taken. The caption states that the court began on the 24th day of March, 1924, but does not state when same adjourned. The matter is discussed in Lowrey v. State, 244 S. W. Rep. 147, which cites authorities supporting the proposition here advanced by the State.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yarborough v. State, 273 S.W. 842, 100 Tex. Crim. 480, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 535 (Tex. 1925).

273 S.W. 842 (Yarborough v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knight v. State
31 S.W.2d 1082 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Blackstock v. State
29 S.W.2d 365 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Sherman v. State
28 S.W.2d 801 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Scroggins v. State
22 S.W.2d 1072 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Ward v. State
18 S.W.2d 614 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Terry v. State
16 S.W.2d 815 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Seaton v. State
16 S.W.2d 823 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Holder v. State
18 S.W.2d 661 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Humphreys v. State
12 S.W.2d 568 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Cousineau v. State
10 S.W.2d 98 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)