Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/Blackstock v. State

Blackstock v. State

29 S.W.2d 365, 115 Tex. Crim. 284, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 443
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 14, 1930·No. No. 13267.·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

The offense is possessing a still, mash and equipment for the purpose of manufacturing intoxicating liquor; the punishment confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The caption fails to show the date of the adjournment of the trial court. Under the decisions of this court, the appeal must be dismissed. Yarborough v. State, 273 S.W. 842; Lowery v. State, 244 S.W. 147; Cousineau v. State, 110 Tex.Crim. R..

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blackstock v. State, 29 S.W.2d 365, 115 Tex. Crim. 284, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 443 (Tex. 1930).

29 S.W.2d 365 (Blackstock v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brosky v. State
915 S.W.2d 120 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Moffett v. State
207 S.W.2d 384 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1948)
Schorr v. State
132 S.W.2d 898 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Eron Harris v. State
97 S.W.2d 226 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Templin v. State
58 S.W.2d 823 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Chandler v. State
49 S.W.2d 778 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)