Blackstock v. State

29 S.W.2d 365, 115 Tex. Crim. 284, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 443
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 14, 1930
DocketNo. 13267.
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 29 S.W.2d 365 (Blackstock v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blackstock v. State, 29 S.W.2d 365, 115 Tex. Crim. 284, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 443 (Tex. 1930).

Opinions

The offense is possessing a still, mash and equipment for the purpose of manufacturing intoxicating liquor; the punishment confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The caption fails to show the date of the adjournment of the trial court. Under the decisions of this court, the appeal must be dismissed. Yarborough v. State, 273 S.W. 842; Lowery v. State, 244 S.W. 147; Cousineau v. State, 110 Tex.Crim. R..

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brosky v. State
915 S.W.2d 120 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Moffett v. State
207 S.W.2d 384 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1948)
Schorr v. State
132 S.W.2d 898 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Eron Harris v. State
97 S.W.2d 226 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Templin v. State
58 S.W.2d 823 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Chandler v. State
49 S.W.2d 778 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 S.W.2d 365, 115 Tex. Crim. 284, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blackstock-v-state-texcrimapp-1930.