Yankton Sioux Tribe v. Southern Missouri Waste Management District

Eighth Circuit

Yankton Sioux Tribe v. Southern Missouri Waste Management District

141 F.3d 798

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedMarch 24, 1998

DocketNo. 95-2647

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 141 F.3d 798 (Yankton Sioux Tribe v. Southern Missouri Waste Management District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yankton Sioux Tribe v. Southern Missouri Waste Management District, 141 F.3d 798 (8th Cir. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

[799]*799JUDGMENT

On the court’s own motion, the mandate issued on January 14, 1997 is recalled. It is further ordered that the court’s opinion and judgment of October 24, 1996 are vacated.

It is hereby ordered that the matter is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in number 96-1581 South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe, et al., 522 U.S.-, 118 S.Ct. 789, 139 L.Ed.2d 773 (1998).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[799]*799JUDGMENT

On the court’s own motion, the mandate issued on January 14, 1997 is recalled. It is further ordered that the court’s opinion and judgment of October 24, 1996 are vacated.

It is hereby ordered that the matter is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in number 96-1581 South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe, et al., 522 U.S.-, 118 S.Ct. 789, 139 L.Ed.2d 773 (1998).

Yankton Sioux Tribe, and Its Individual Members, United States of America, on Its Own Behalf and for the Benefit of the Yankton Sioux Tribe, Intervenor v. Matt Gaffey, States Attorney of Charles Mix County Herman Peters, Member of the Charles Mix, South Dakota,.counnty Commission Bruce Bakken,member of the Charles Mix, South Dakota, County Commission Jack Soulek, Member of the Charles Mix, South Dakota, County Commission, William Janklow, Governor of South Dakota Mark W. Barnett, Attorney General of South Dakota,defendants. Gary Beeson, Landowner City of Dante City of Geddes City of Lake Andes City of Pickstown City of Platte City of Ravinia City of Wagner Harvey P. Weisser, Doing Business as Weisser Oil Co., Inc., Individually, Amici on Behalf Of

188 F.3d 1010 (Eighth Circuit, 1999)

Yankton Sioux Tribe, a Federally Recognized Tribe of Indians, and Its Individual Members Darrell E. Drapeau, Individually, a Member of the Yankton Sioux Tribe v. Southern Missouri Waste Management District, a Non-Profit Corporation, Defendant-Third Party v. State of South Dakota, Third Party Charles Mix County, South Dakota Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe, Inc. United States of America, Amicus Curiae, Vine Deloria, Jr. Philip S. Deloria Philip Lane, Sr. Philip Lane, Jr. James Weddell, Descendants of Francois Deloria, and Descendants and Relatives of Philip J. Deloria, Chief of Band Eight of the Yankton Sioux Tribe, at the Time of the Negotiation and Ratification of the Agreement of December 31, 1892, Amici Curiae

141 F.3d 798 (Third Circuit, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 F.3d 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yankton-sioux-tribe-v-southern-missouri-waste-management-district-ca8-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack