Yankton Sioux Tribe, a Federally Recognized Tribe of Indians, and Its Individual Members Darrell E. Drapeau, Individually, a Member of the Yankton Sioux Tribe v. Southern Missouri Waste Management District, a Non-Profit Corporation, Defendant-Third Party v. State of South Dakota, Third Party Charles Mix County, South Dakota Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe, Inc. United States of America, Amicus Curiae, Vine Deloria, Jr. Philip S. Deloria Philip Lane, Sr. Philip Lane, Jr. James Weddell, Descendants of Francois Deloria, and Descendants and Relatives of Philip J. Deloria, Chief of Band Eight of the Yankton Sioux Tribe, at the Time of the Negotiation and Ratification of the Agreement of December 31, 1892, Amici Curiae

141 F.3d 798, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 5811

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
• Decided: March 24, 1998
• Docket: 95-2647
• Status: Published

Opinion

141 F.3d 798

YANKTON SIOUX TRIBE, a federally recognized tribe of
Indians, and its individual members; Darrell E.
Drapeau, individually, a member of the
Yankton Sioux Tribe,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
SOUTHERN MISSOURI WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, a non-profit
corporation, Defendant-Third party plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, Third party defendant-Appellant,
Charles Mix County, South Dakota; Flandreau Santee Sioux
Tribe, Inc.; United States of America, Amicus Curiae,
Vine Deloria, Jr.; Philip S. Deloria; Philip Lane, Sr.;
Philip Lane, Jr.; James Weddell, Descendants of Francois
Deloria, and descendants and relatives of Philip J. Deloria,
Chief of Band Eight of the Yankton Sioux Tribe, at the time
of the negotiation and ratification of the agreement of
December 31, 1892, Amici curiae.

No. 95-2647.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

March 24, 1998.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota; Lawrence L. Piersol, Judge.

Prior report: 99 F.3d 1439.JUDGMENT

On the court's own motion, the mandate issued on January 14, 1997 is recalled. It is further ordered that the court's opinion and judgment of October 24, 1996 are vacated.

It is hereby ordered that the matter is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in number 96-1581 South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe, et al., 522 U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 789, 139 L.Ed.2d 773 (1998).