Yamada v. Natural Disaster Claims Commission

516 P.2d 336, 55 Haw. 126
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided November 28, 1973·No. NO. 5223·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The petition for rehearing is denied without argument. The opinion of the court filed herein is limited to this case and the facts presented therein. The opinion does not govern other natural disaster claim cases involving facts different from those presented in this case.

We reaffirm the reversal of the judgment appealed from on the principal ground stated in the opinion, and not on the alternative ground relating to equitable estoppel. There may be situations in which the government may be equitably estopped, but, upon further consideration, we do not think that this case presents such a situation.

Chief Justice Richardson, who dissented from the majority and Judge Kawakami, who now joins the Chief Justice in his dissent, do not concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yamada v. Natural Disaster Claims Commission, 516 P.2d 336, 55 Haw. 126 (haw 1973).

516 P.2d 336 (Yamada v. Natural Disaster Claims Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tax Appeal of Wasson-Bendon Partners v. Kamikawa
999 P.2d 865 (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals, 2000)
Simpson v. Department of Land & Natural Resources
791 P.2d 1267 (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals, 1990)
Filipo v. Chang
618 P.2d 295 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1980)
McBRYDE SUGAR COMPANY, LIMITED v. Robinson
517 P.2d 26 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1973)