Yalkowsky v. Yalkowsky

New York Court of Appeals

Yalkowsky v. Yalkowsky

461 N.E.2d 290, 61 N.Y.2d 767, 473 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4054

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 14, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 461 N.E.2d 290 (Yalkowsky v. Yalkowsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yalkowsky v. Yalkowsky, 461 N.E.2d 290, 61 N.Y.2d 767, 473 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4054 (N.Y. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The determination by the Appellate Division, that the weight of the conflicting evidence on defendant’s counterclaim to set aside her conveyance of the marital residence to her husband preponderated in favor of the plaintiff, comports with the record as well as with the negative response by the advisory jury to the question whether the deed had been executed under duress.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Kaye concur; Judge Simons taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI