Yalkowsky v. Yalkowsky

461 N.E.2d 290, 61 N.Y.2d 767, 473 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4054
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 14, 1984·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The determination by the Appellate Division, that the weight of the conflicting evidence on defendant’s counterclaim to set aside her conveyance of the marital residence to her husband preponderated in favor of the plaintiff, comports with the record as well as with the negative response by the advisory jury to the question whether the deed had been executed under duress.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Kaye concur; Judge Simons taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yalkowsky v. Yalkowsky, 461 N.E.2d 290, 61 N.Y.2d 767, 473 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4054 (N.Y. 1984).

461 N.E.2d 290 (Yalkowsky v. Yalkowsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gruen v. Gruen
104 A.D.2d 171 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)