Yagman v. Johns

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6633

STEPHEN YAGMAN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

TRACY JOHNS; ARTHUR BEELER; HARLEY LAPPIN; KIM WHITE; KERRY MOTTERN; MITCHELL SPRINKLE; DERICK PHILLIPS,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

TEN UNKNOWN NAMED FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON OFFICERS AND/OR EMPLOYEES,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:08-ct-03089-FL)

Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 5, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen Yagman, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Stephen Yagman appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six

Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388

(1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Yagman v. Johns, No. 5:08-ct-03089-FL (E.D.N.C.

Mar. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED