Yagman v. Johns
This text of Yagman v. Johns (Yagman v. Johns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6297
STEPHEN YAGMAN,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
TRACY JOHNS,
Respondent – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:08-hc-02103-D)
Submitted: June 9, 2009 Decided: July 7, 2009
Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Erwin Chemerinsky, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE SCHOOL OF LAW, Irvine, California, for Appellant. Christina Ann Thompson, BUREAU OF PRISONS, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Stephen Yagman, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2006) petition and denying his motion for sanctions. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Yagman
v. Johns, No. 5:08-hc-02103-D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2009). We deny
Yagman’s motion to schedule oral argument and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Yagman v. Johns, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yagman-v-johns-ca4-2009.