Yagman v. Johns

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 7, 2009
Docket09-6297
StatusUnpublished

This text of Yagman v. Johns (Yagman v. Johns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yagman v. Johns, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6297

STEPHEN YAGMAN,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

TRACY JOHNS,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:08-hc-02103-D)

Submitted: June 9, 2009 Decided: July 7, 2009

Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Erwin Chemerinsky, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE SCHOOL OF LAW, Irvine, California, for Appellant. Christina Ann Thompson, BUREAU OF PRISONS, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Stephen Yagman, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2006) petition and denying his motion for sanctions. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Yagman

v. Johns, No. 5:08-hc-02103-D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2009). We deny

Yagman’s motion to schedule oral argument and dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Yagman v. Johns, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yagman-v-johns-ca4-2009.