Yaffe v. Mintz & Fraade, P. C.

283 A.D.2d 255, 724 N.Y.S.2d 610, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5059
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Yaffe v. Mintz & Fraade, P. C.. Read the opinion of the Court — 270 A.D.2d 43

Opinion

—Amended order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered April 28, 2000, which, insofar as appealed from, confirmed an arbitration award in favor of petitioners and against respondent, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Respondent fails to make a clear and convincing showing that its absent witness could have presented any evidence that was not already before the arbitrator, or that could not have been presented to the arbitrator by way of documents that ought to have been preserved as a record of respondent’s business. Thus, respondent’s application to vacate the award on the ground that it was misconduct for the arbitrator to refuse an adjournment or a continuance was properly denied (see, Matter of Banas [Leumi Sec. Corp.], 194 AD2d 390). Respondent’s other arguments challenge unreviewable findings concerning the meaning of the parties’ agreement (see, Matter [256]*256of Silverman [Benmor Coats], 61 NY2d 299, 308). Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yaffe v. Mintz & Fraade, P. C., 283 A.D.2d 255, 724 N.Y.S.2d 610, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5059 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

283 A.D.2d 255 (Yaffe v. Mintz & Fraade, P. C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Norris v. Cooper
461 N.E.2d 1261 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
In re the Arbitration between Banas & Leumi Securities Corp.
194 A.D.2d 390 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)