Yaffe v. Mintz & Fraade, P. C.

270 A.D.2d 43, 704 N.Y.S.2d 467, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2563
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 7, 2000·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.), entered December 16, 1998, which granted the petition to consolidate petitioners’ pending arbitration proceedings, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion in consolidating the arbitration proceedings, all of which involved claims that respondent failed to compensate petitioners in accordance with their “of counsel” contracts (see, County of Sullivan v Edward L. Nezalek, Inc., 42 NY2d 123, 128-129). Respondent’s claim that it was substantially prejudiced in the arbitration proceeding by the consolidation order is not properly before the Court as being dehors the record on appeal. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Ellerin, Wallach and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yaffe v. Mintz & Fraade, P. C., 270 A.D.2d 43, 704 N.Y.S.2d 467, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2563 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

270 A.D.2d 43 (Yaffe v. Mintz & Fraade, P. C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd.
728 F. Supp. 2d 462 (S.D. New York, 2010)
Kallas v. Weiss
61 A.D.3d 451 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
East Meadow Union Free School District v. East Meadow Teachers Ass'n
7 A.D.3d 621 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)