Yacone v. Ryan Homes, Inc.

216 A.D.2d 963, 629 N.Y.S.2d 159, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7394
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 9, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 216 A.D.2d 963 (Yacone v. Ryan Homes, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yacone v. Ryan Homes, Inc., 216 A.D.2d 963, 629 N.Y.S.2d 159, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7394 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in granting the motion of defendants to vacate their default (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [1]). Defendants’ default resulted from law office failure on the part of defendants’ original attorney. A motion to vacate a default resulting from law office failure may be made pursuant to CPLR 2005 (see, Raphael v Cohen, 62 NY2d 700, 701; First Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn. v O’Daly, 201 AD2d 532). The motion to vacate was based upon the failure of defendants’ former attorney to respond to plaintiffs interrogatories and other failures on counsel’s part. Defendants’ new counsel also included with the moving papers the completed interrogatories that were the subject of the court’s prior conditional orders requiring compliance with plaintiffs request for interrogatories. Thus, defendants demonstrated a valid excuse for their default (see, Lane v Donnelly, 184 AD2d 840). In addition, defendants submitted an affidavit establishing that they had a meritorious defense to the action. Moreover, it does not appear that plaintiff was unduly [964]*964prejudiced by the delay. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J.—Vacate Default.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lauer v. City of Buffalo
53 A.D.3d 213 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Hayes v. R.S. Maher & Son, Inc.
303 A.D.2d 1018 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Massachusetts Asset Financing Corp. v. DiLaura
299 A.D.2d 948 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Mayville v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
273 A.D.2d 944 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Steinbarth v. Otis Elevator Co.
244 A.D.2d 930 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Linzy v. Christa Construction, Inc.
238 A.D.2d 936 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 A.D.2d 963, 629 N.Y.S.2d 159, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yacone-v-ryan-homes-inc-nyappdiv-1995.