Steinbarth v. Otis Elevator Co.

244 A.D.2d 930, 665 N.Y.S.2d 237, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12293
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 1997·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendant’s motion to vacate the default (see, CPLR 5015 [a]). The court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the impairment of defendant’s former attorney by alcoholism constituted a reasonable excuse for the default (see, Jiminez v St. John’s Riverside Hosp., 161 AD2d 497), and defendant demonstrated that it has meritorious defenses to the action (see, Yacone v Ryan Homes, 216 AD2d 963). Finally, defendant has remedied its default in complying with the court’s discovery orders, and there is no indication that plaintiffs were unduly prejudiced by any delay (see, Yacone v Ryan Homes, supra, at 963-964). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.— Vacate Default Judgment.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Wisner, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steinbarth v. Otis Elevator Co., 244 A.D.2d 930, 665 N.Y.S.2d 237, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12293 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

244 A.D.2d 930 (Steinbarth v. Otis Elevator Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lauer v. City of Buffalo
53 A.D.3d 213 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Buja v. Shepard Niles, Inc.
45 A.D.3d 1391 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Estate of Taylor v. Moreno
294 A.D.2d 821 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)