Wynter v. Luna
This text of 114 F. App'x 847 (Wynter v. Luna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Arizona prisoner Derrick George Wynter appeals pro se the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for lack of jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.
Wynter contends that he is not removable because he is a national of the United States. The district court correctly dismissed Wynter’s petition because it had no jurisdiction to address his claim. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(5).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
114 F. App'x 847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wynter-v-luna-ca9-2004.