Wynder v. State
This text of Wynder v. State (Wynder v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed August 8, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D18-1428 Lower Tribunal No. 13-28458 ________________
Michael Roman Wynder, Petitioner,
vs.
The State of Florida, Respondent.
A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Belated Appeal.
Michael Roman Wynder, in proper person.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for respondent.
Before LAGOA, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ.
LAGOA, J.
Michael Wynder (“Wynder”) filed a petition seeking a belated appeal
pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141. The petition, however,
failed to set forth any facts that constitute the basis for entitlement to a belated appeal as required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c)(4)(F).
Additionally, the petition was not sworn to as required by rule 9.141(c)(4)(F).
Accordingly, we deny the petition as facially insufficient. See Gugelman v. State,
940 So. 2d 503, 504 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Abbot v. State, 929 So. 2d 723 (Fla. 5th
DCA 2006). The denial is without prejudice to Wynder filing a properly sworn
petition that complies with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c)(4).
Petition for belated appeal denied without prejudice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wynder v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wynder-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.