Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Abbot v. State

Abbot v. State

929 So. 2d 723, 2006 WL 1459852
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 26, 2006·No. 5D06-1243·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

929 So.2d 723 (2006)

Erik T. ABBOT, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 5D06-1243.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

May 26, 2006.

Erik T. Abott, Jasper, for Petitioner.

No Appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Abbot petitions this court for a belated appeal. We deny his petition without prejudice. To the extent Abbot claims ineffective assistance of counsel, he must pursue these claims by filing a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 in the trial court. To the extent that he seeks a belated appeal, his pleading is insufficient because his petition is unsworn. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(3)(F); Cosby v. State, 911 So.2d 275 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

Petition for Belated Appeal DENIED Without Prejudice.

SHARP, W., SAWAYA and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abbot v. State, 929 So. 2d 723, 2006 WL 1459852 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

929 So. 2d 723 (Abbot v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wynder v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018
COTTO-MARCANO v. State
27 So. 3d 774 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Brown v. State
985 So. 2d 65 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Green v. State
941 So. 2d 1250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
GUGELMAN v. State
940 So. 2d 503 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Gonzalez v. State
938 So. 2d 641 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Popp v. State
935 So. 2d 93 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Henao v. Professional Shoe Repair, Inc.
929 So. 2d 723 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)