Wynder, JR. v. Mateer

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KENNETHN.WYNDERIR, SS Plaintiff, -against- 24 CIVIL 8899 (KMW) JUDGMENT ROBERT MATEER and THOMAS TERMINELLE, Defendants. wn KX It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated June 9, 2025, the Court has dismissed Plaintiff's complaint, filed IFP under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), for failure to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i1). The Court has declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state law claims Plaintiff may be asserting. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accordingly, the case is closed.

Dated: New York, New York June 10, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerkof Court BY: HK MANGO Deputy Clerk