Wyman v. . Wyman

90 N.E. 1167, 197 N.Y. 524, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 780
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 17, 1909·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, without costs, on the ground that in any view of the will the widow has an estate that bars a present action of partition; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Willard Bartlett, Hiscooii and Chase, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wyman v. . Wyman, 90 N.E. 1167, 197 N.Y. 524, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 780 (N.Y. 1909).

90 N.E. 1167 (Wyman v. . Wyman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Probate of the Will of Bright
20 Misc. 2d 789 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1959)
In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Allen
257 A.D. 718 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)
In re the Estate of Hock
160 Misc. 621 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1936)
In re the Estate of Lippman
154 Misc. 915 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1935)
In re the Estate of Maguire
154 Misc. 704 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1935)
In re Proving the Last Will & Testament & Codicil Thereto of Lane
234 A.D. 775 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)
In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Acres
128 Misc. 254 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1926)
In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament & Codicils of Baldwin
216 A.D. 111 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)
In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Ewen
206 A.D. 198 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1923)
In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Prentice
110 Misc. 456 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1920)