Wyche v. New York Life Insurance

207 N.C. 45
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 19, 1934·Published

Opinion

Staoy, C. J.

The demurrer to the evidence was properly overruled on authority of the first Mitchell case, 205 N. C., 721, 172 S. E., 497. But the facts found by the court are insufficient to support the judgment, in that it is not made to appear when the defendant received due proof of plaintiff’s disability, and that such disability had then existed for not less than sixty days, as provided by the policy. Hundley v. Ins. Co., 205 N. C., 780, 172 S. E., 361; Rhyne v. Ins. Co., 199 N. C., 419, 154 S. E., 749; Guy v. Casualty Co., 151 N. C., 465, 66 S. E., 437. Hence, the cause will be remanded for further proceedings as to justice appertains and as the rights of the parties may require.

Error and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wyche v. New York Life Insurance, 207 N.C. 45 (N.C. 1934).

207 N.C. 45 (Wyche v. New York Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rhyne v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance
154 S.E. 749 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
Guy v. U. S. Casualty Co.
66 S.E. 437 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1909)
Hundley v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.
172 S.E. 361 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
Mitchell v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
172 S.E. 497 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)