Wyatt v. Lynchburg & Durham Railroad

13 S.E. 779, 109 N.C. 306
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 5, 1891
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 S.E. 779 (Wyatt v. Lynchburg & Durham Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wyatt v. Lynchburg & Durham Railroad, 13 S.E. 779, 109 N.C. 306 (N.C. 1891).

Opinion

Clark, J.:

The transcript shows process, a reference to arbitration, an award, exception thereto, the action of the Court below thereon and an appeal, but there are no pleadings nor an agreed state of facts in lieu thereof, that we might see the contention of the parties, and that the Court below had jurisdiction of the cause of action.

The Court would permit the pleadings to be filed in this Court nunc pro tunc (Rule 26), so as not to delay the hearing, but as both parties are not able to do this, the cause must be remanded. The case is substantially the same as Daniel v. Rogers, 95 N. C., 134; Rowland v. Mitchell, 90 N. C., 649.

Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ferrabow v. . Green
14 S.E. 973 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 S.E. 779, 109 N.C. 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wyatt-v-lynchburg-durham-railroad-nc-1891.