Rowland Bros. v. R. J. Mitchell & Son

90 N.C. 649
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 5, 1884
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 90 N.C. 649 (Rowland Bros. v. R. J. Mitchell & Son) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rowland Bros. v. R. J. Mitchell & Son, 90 N.C. 649 (N.C. 1884).

Opinion

*650 Smith, C. J.

The transcript of the record before us certified to be “full and accurate,” contains only the judgment rendered in the superior court, reciting that the case comes up on appeal from a justice’s court, the case embodying the exceptions signed by the respective counsel, and the appeal undertaking.

There is no process, nor waiver, nor pleading by -which we can see that the cause was properly constituted in the superior court, nor, except from the case, what was the subject of contention.

We cannot assume jurisdiction upon such a record, and must,, according to the rules for such imperfections, remand the cause. Weil v. Everitt, 83 N. C., 685.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wyatt v. Lynchburg & Durham Railroad
13 S.E. 779 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1891)
Jones v. . Hoggard
12 S.E. 286 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1890)
State v. . Preston
10 S.E. 84 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1889)
Daniel v. . Rogers
95 N.C. 134 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1886)
Bethea v. . Byrd
93 N.C. 141 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 N.C. 649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowland-bros-v-r-j-mitchell-son-nc-1884.