Rowland Bros. v. R. J. Mitchell & Son

90 N.C. 649
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 5, 1884·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

*650 Smith, C. J.

The transcript of the record before us certified to be “full and accurate,” contains only the judgment rendered in the superior court, reciting that the case comes up on appeal from a justice’s court, the case embodying the exceptions signed by the respective counsel, and the appeal undertaking.

There is no process, nor waiver, nor pleading by -which we can see that the cause was properly constituted in the superior court, nor, except from the case, what was the subject of contention.

We cannot assume jurisdiction upon such a record, and must,, according to the rules for such imperfections, remand the cause. Weil v. Everitt, 83 N. C., 685.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rowland Bros. v. R. J. Mitchell & Son, 90 N.C. 649 (N.C. 1884).

90 N.C. 649 (Rowland Bros. v. R. J. Mitchell & Son) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wyatt v. Lynchburg & Durham Railroad
13 S.E. 779 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1891)
Jones v. . Hoggard
12 S.E. 286 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1890)
State v. . Preston
10 S.E. 84 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1889)
Daniel v. . Rogers
95 N.C. 134 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1886)
Bethea v. . Byrd
93 N.C. 141 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1885)