Wurmlinger v. Freer
This text of 256 A.D.2d 1069 (Wurmlinger v. Freer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court did not err in dismissing the petition seeking modification of a prior custody order without conducting a hearing. The child, born March 13, 1989, lived with both petitioner and respondent, his parents, until he was three. In 1993 Family Court awarded the parties joint custody with primary physical residence with respondent father. The order was modified in 1996 to provide for supervision of petitioner mother’s visitation. On March 19, 1997, upon consent of the parties, joint custody with primary physical residence with respondent was continued and supervision of petitioner’s visitation was eliminated. Petitioner filed the instant petition a few months later, on August 13, 1997, seeking primary physical custody of the child. The changed circumstances alleged by petitioner, even if established, are insufficient to show that a change in the child’s primary residence would be in the child’s best interests. A hearing is not automatically required whenever a parent seeks modification of a custody order (see, David W. v Julia W., 158 AD2d 1, 6-7). (Appeal from Order of Cattaraugus County Family Court, Nenno, J. — Custody.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Callahan, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 A.D.2d 1069, 682 N.Y.S.2d 757, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wurmlinger-v-freer-nyappdiv-1998.