Brehm v. Uhrich

283 A.D.2d 981, 724 N.Y.S.2d 388, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4570
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 2, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 283 A.D.2d 981 (Brehm v. Uhrich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brehm v. Uhrich, 283 A.D.2d 981, 724 N.Y.S.2d 388, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4570 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Contrary to petitioner’s contention, Family Court did not err in dismissing the petition to modify the prior custody order without conducting a hearing (see, Matter of Wurmlinger v Freer, 256 AD2d 1069). Petitioner failed to make a sufficient evidentiary showing to warrant a hearing (see, Matter of Jones v Stone, 267 AD2d 1054; David W. v Julia W., 158 AD2d 1, 6-7). (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Figliola, J.H.O. — Custody.) Present— Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Kehoe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Di Fiore v. Scott
2 A.D.3d 1417 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
283 A.D.2d 981, 724 N.Y.S.2d 388, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brehm-v-uhrich-nyappdiv-2001.