Brehm v. Uhrich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brehm v. Uhrich

283 A.D.2d 981, 724 N.Y.S.2d 388, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4570

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 2, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Contrary to petitioner’s contention, Family Court did not err in dismissing the petition to modify the prior custody order without conducting a hearing (see, Matter of Wurmlinger v Freer, 256 AD2d 1069). Petitioner failed to make a sufficient evidentiary showing to warrant a hearing (see, Matter of Jones v Stone, 267 AD2d 1054; David W. v Julia W., 158 AD2d 1, 6-7). (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Figliola, J.H.O. — Custody.) Present— Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Kehoe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Contrary to petitioner’s contention, Family Court did not err in dismissing the petition to modify the prior custody order without conducting a hearing (see, Matter of Wurmlinger v Freer, 256 AD2d 1069). Petitioner failed to make a sufficient evidentiary showing to warrant a hearing (see, Matter of Jones v Stone, 267 AD2d 1054; David W. v Julia W., 158 AD2d 1, 6-7). (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Figliola, J.H.O. — Custody.) Present— Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Kehoe, JJ.

Brehm v. Uhrich, 283 A.D.2d 981, 724 N.Y.S.2d 388, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4570 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

283 A.D.2d 981 (Brehm v. Uhrich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related