Wrobleski v. The City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided September 27, 2021·No. 1:18-cv-08208·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK □□ eK JESSICA WROBLESKI, Plaintiff, -against- 18 CIVIL 8208 (VSB) JUDGMENT CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants. □□ eK It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated September 24, 2021, just like the court in Wrobleski I, the Court empathizes with the Plaintiff’s pain over the loss of custody of her child. However, there is nothing that any judge of this Court can do to provide Plaintiff with the relief she seeks. For the foregoing reasons, the motions to dismiss are GRANTED. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith; therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for purposes of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962).; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York September 27, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: K Mango Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wrobleski v. The City of New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Wrobleski v. The City of New York (Wrobleski v. The City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)