Wright v. State

53 S.W.2d 1118, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 928
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wright v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 117 Tex. Crim. 93
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 19, 1932·No. No. 15626·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction for robbery; punishment, five years in the penitentiary.

Appellant was charged with robbery by the use of firearms. He made a motion to quash the indictment. He asked one special charge, which was given. He made a motion for new trial, which was overruled, but no complaint is made by bill of exception of any proceeding, nor is there in the record a statement of facts.

No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 53 S.W.2d 1118, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 928 (Tex. 1932).

53 S.W.2d 1118 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.