Wright v. State

36 S.W.2d 747, 117 Tex. Crim. 603, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 508
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 18, 1931·No. No. 13919.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Conviction is for theft of cattle; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The caption of the transcript fails to show the adjourning date of the term of the trial court.

The recognizance is fatally defective. The requisites of an appeal bond or recognizance on appeal are set out in Article 817, C. C. P. The recognizance in the present case is an appearance recognizance only to the trial court. It nowhere requires appellant to abide the action of this court. On account of such defects the appeal must be dismissed. Appellant will have fifteen days from this date to file an appeal bond under Article 818, C. C. P., and bring it forward to this court in connection with a motion to reinstate his appeal if he so desires.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

ON MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 36 S.W.2d 747, 117 Tex. Crim. 603, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 508 (Tex. 1931).

36 S.W.2d 747 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moore v. State
71 S.W.2d 531 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1934)