Wright v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Wright v. State

1913 OK CR 375, 136 P. 1198, 10 Okla. Crim. 667, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 369

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 20, 1913

DocketNo. A-1875.

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK CR 375 (Wright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wright v. State, 1913 OK CR 375, 136 P. 1198, 10 Okla. Crim. 667, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 369 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CUBIAM.

Plaintiffs in error were indicted in the district court of Murray county December 16, 1911, for the offense of playing poker. Which indictment was duly transferred to the county court of said county. On October 8, 1912, the case came on for trial. The jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged. On October 14, 1912, the court rendered judgment and sentenced each of the defendants to pay a fine of fifty dollars. To reverse the judgment the defendants appealed. We have examined the record and we do not find that it contains any error prejudicial to the substantial rights of the defendants. The judgment of the county court of Murray county is therefore in all things affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CUBIAM.

Plaintiffs in error were indicted in the district court of Murray county December 16, 1911, for the offense of playing poker. Which indictment was duly transferred to the county court of said county. On October 8, 1912, the case came on for trial. The jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged. On October 14, 1912, the court rendered judgment and sentenced each of the defendants to pay a fine of fifty dollars. To reverse the judgment the defendants appealed. We have examined the record and we do not find that it contains any error prejudicial to the substantial rights of the defendants. The judgment of the county court of Murray county is therefore in all things affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK CR 375, 136 P. 1198, 10 Okla. Crim. 667, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-state-oklacrimapp-1913.