Wright v. State

1912 OK CR 329, 123 P. 1135, 7 Okla. Crim. 732, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 199
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wright v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 7 Okla. Crim. 280
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided May 9, 1912·No. No. A-1391.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Tom Wright, was convicted at the April, 1911, term of the county court of Seminole county on a charge of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and his punishment fixed at a fine of fifty dollars and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of thirty days. We have carefully examined the record, and find no errors prejudicial to the substantial rights of the plaintiff! in error. The judgment of the trial court is, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 1912 OK CR 329, 123 P. 1135, 7 Okla. Crim. 732, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 199 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

1912 OK CR 329 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.