Wright v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Wright v. State

1914 OK 247, 140 P. 1147, 42 Okla. 251, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 345

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided May 12, 1914·No. 3711·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the state of Oklahoma in the sum of $1,500, and against the plaintiffs in error, as principal and sureties on a forfeited bail bond. The petition in error with case-made was filed in this court March 20, 1912, and the cause was regularly set down for submission and submitted on the 16th day of April, 1914. The plaintiffs in error have not served oi filed briefs as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix).

On account of such default and failure, as prescribed in said rule, the judgment appealed from should be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the state of Oklahoma in the sum of $1,500, and against the plaintiffs in error, as principal and sureties on a forfeited bail bond. The petition in error with case-made was filed in this court March 20, 1912, and the cause was regularly set down for submission and submitted on the 16th day of April, 1914. The plaintiffs in error have not served oi filed briefs as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix).

On account of such default and failure, as prescribed in said rule, the judgment appealed from should be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Wright v. State, 1914 OK 247, 140 P. 1147, 42 Okla. 251, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 345 (Okla. 1914).

Pincite

1914 OK 247 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related