Lovelace v. Casey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Lovelace v. Casey

1915 OK 622, 151 P. 846, 51 Okla. 239, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 961

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 14, 1915

Docket4536

StatusPublished

This text of 1915 OK 622 (Lovelace v. Casey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lovelace v. Casey, 1915 OK 622, 151 P. 846, 51 Okla. 239, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 961 (Okla. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

THACKER, C.

The plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff in the trial court, has wholly failed to serve and file briefs, as required by rule 7 of this court (38-Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix), or to excuse his failure to do so; and this case has been submitted for decision upon the petition in error, with case-made attached.

Following the case of Wright et al. v. State, 42 Okla. 251, 140 Pac. 1147, the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed for failure of plaintiff in error to serve and file briefs.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI