Lovelace v. Casey
Opinion
Opinion by
The plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff in the trial court, has wholly failed to serve and file briefs, as required by rule 7 of this court (38-Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix), or to excuse his failure to do so; and this case has been submitted for decision upon the petition in error, with case-made attached.
Following the case of Wright et al. v. State, 42 Okla. 251, 140 Pac. 1147, the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed for failure of plaintiff in error to serve and file briefs.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1915 OK 622 (Lovelace v. Casey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.