Wright v. State

131 S.E.2d 566, 107 Ga. App. 800, 1963 Ga. App. LEXIS 990
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 21, 1963·No. 40136·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

107 Ga. App. 800 (1963)
131 S.E.2d 566

WRIGHT
v.
THE STATE.

40136.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided May 21, 1963.

Walter O. Allanson, for plaintiff in error.

William T. Boyd, Solicitor General, Frank S. French, Eugene L. Tiller, contra.

FRANKUM, Judge.

The evidence authorized the conviction of the defendant. The sole special ground of the defendant's motion for new trial assigns error on the admission of certain testimony over objection. The record shows that the trial *801 judge, in ruling on the objection, reserved his decision until later in the trial. It does not appear that any further objection to this testimony was made or that the matter was thereafter called to the judge's attention. It was not incumbent upon the judge to bear the matter in mind and on his own motion exclude that which had been conditionally admitted. If counsel desired some further ruling, he should have invoked it by calling the matter to the court's attention. Gibson v. State, 178 Ga. 707, 708 (2) (174 SE 354); Griffin v. State, 85 Ga. App. 602, 604 (6) (69 SE2d 665). The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed. Nichols, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 131 S.E.2d 566, 107 Ga. App. 800, 1963 Ga. App. LEXIS 990 (Ga. Ct. App. 1963).

131 S.E.2d 566 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cupp v. State
143 S.E.2d 197 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)