Gurin v. BITUMINOUS CASUALTY COMPANY

131 S.E.2d 566, 107 Ga. App. 823, 1963 Ga. App. LEXIS 996
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 23, 1963
Docket40142
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 131 S.E.2d 566 (Gurin v. BITUMINOUS CASUALTY COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gurin v. BITUMINOUS CASUALTY COMPANY, 131 S.E.2d 566, 107 Ga. App. 823, 1963 Ga. App. LEXIS 996 (Ga. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

Jordan, Judge.

Nathan Herbert Gurin filed a claim before the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation against his former employer, Gate City Table Company, and a hearing to determine liability, disability, compensation and medical was conducted by a deputy director of the board who entered an award denying compensation. The full board on appeal adopted the findings of fact of the deputy director and likewise denied compensation. The Superior Court of Fulton County affirmed the award of the full board and the exception is to that judgment. Held:

The denial of compensation in this case was fully authorized by the evidence which disclosed that the claimant had arteriosclerotic heart disease which was neither produced nor aggravated by his employment. While the evidence further disclosed that the exertion required by the claimant’s job caused him pain, such fact would not authorize a finding of accidental injury; for, as was held in Johnston v. Boston-Old Colony Ins. Co., 106 Ga. App. 410 (126 SE2d 919), “The legal cause of the pain in such a case is the physical condition of the employee and not the exertion on the job. This case is not like the cases where exertion on the job causes heart damage which incapacitates the employee. Here there is no heart damage except from disease. Pain suffered by an employee because he engages in an occupation which he is physically unable to perform is not an accidental injury.”

Judgment affirmed.

Nichols, P. J., and Frankum, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steinberg v. Star Expansion Co.
251 S.E.2d 160 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Carter v. Kansas City Fire & Marine Insurance
226 S.E.2d 755 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Cox v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance
178 S.E.2d 287 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Wright v. State
131 S.E.2d 566 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 S.E.2d 566, 107 Ga. App. 823, 1963 Ga. App. LEXIS 996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gurin-v-bituminous-casualty-company-gactapp-1963.