Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Wright v. State

Wright v. State

778 So. 2d 536, 2001 WL 219236
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wright v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 711 So. 2d 66 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 7, 2001·No. No. 3D01-423·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lacee Wright appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence. The issues raised by appellant do not relate to the legality of the sentence, and raise issues that must be brought under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Treated as a Rule 3 .850 motion, the motion is [537]*537time-barred and successive. See Fla. R .Crim.P. 3.850(b), (f).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 778 So. 2d 536, 2001 WL 219236 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

778 So. 2d 536 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.