Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Wright v. State

Wright v. State

595 So. 2d 586, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3310, 1992 WL 57161
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wright v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 573 So. 2d 998 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 27, 1992·No. No. 91-495·Published

Opinion

HARRIS, Judge.

We affirm the conviction arid sentence of David Lamar Wright. However, this cause is remanded to correct the scoresheet which improperly scored “legal constraint.” See Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 1058 (Fla. 1991).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED to correct scoresheet.

DAUKSCH and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. State, 595 So. 2d 586, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3310, 1992 WL 57161 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

595 So. 2d 586 (Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Flowers v. State
586 So. 2d 1058 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)