WRIGHT v. SMITH
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DENNIS WRIGHT, CIVIL ACTION Petitioner,
v.
BARRY SMITH, NO. 18-5324 THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PA, and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondents.
O R D E R
AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2020, upon consideration of the Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody filed by pro se petitioner, Dennis Wright (Document No. 1, filed December 10, 2018), the record in this case, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey dated July 29, 2019 (Document No. 9), and pro se petitioner’s Objections to Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation and Motion for Leave to Amend Habeas Corpus [sic] to Assert New Rules of Law (Document No. 13, filed August 29, 2019), for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum dated March 30, 2020, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey dated July 29, 2019, is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. Pro se petitioner’s objections to the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey are OVERRULED; 3. Pro se petitioner’s motion for leave to amend his habeas corpus petition is DENIED; and 4. The Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody filed by pro se petitioner, Dennis Wright, is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability will not issue because reasonable jurists would not debate the propriety of this Court’s procedural rulings with respect to the pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus and the motion for leave to amend. See 28
U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time for filing a notice of appeal or taking any other action relating to this Order and attached Memorandum shall not begin to run until pro se petitioner is served with copies of the said documents.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois
DuBOIS, JAN E., J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
WRIGHT v. SMITH (WRIGHT v. SMITH) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.