Wright v. Looney, Warden

212 F.2d 186
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedMay 13, 1954
Docket4771
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 212 F.2d 186 (Wright v. Looney, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. Looney, Warden, 212 F.2d 186 (10th Cir. 1954).

Opinions

MURRAH, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of' the trial court denying the appellant’s-petition for a writ of habeas corpus on the grounds that the petition presented' no question cognizable in a habeas corpus proceeding.

The petitioner is now serving a sentence under a judgment of the district court for the Eastern District of Illinois-for the unlawful possession and transportation of firearms in interstate commerce, in violation of Title 15 U.S.C.A. § 902(e). He has heretofore attacked, the validity of that judgment in a proceeding under Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255-in which he challenged the constitutionality of the statute under which he was tried and sentenced, and that remedy is-exclusive. Holloway v. Looney, 10 Cir., 207 F.2d 433; Clough v. Hunter, 10 Cir., 191 F.2d 516; Barnes v. Hunter, 10 Cir., 188 F.2d 86; Nelson v. Looney, 10 Cir., 1954, 211 F.2d 89. The petitioner not, having served the sentence under which, he is confined, is not entitled to any relief in habeas corpus.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Houser v. United States
508 F.2d 509 (Eighth Circuit, 1974)
Frank Houser and Winnie Houser v. United States
508 F.2d 509 (Eighth Circuit, 1974)
Norvell M. Bickford v. C. H. Looney, Warden
219 F.2d 555 (Tenth Circuit, 1955)
Wright v. Looney, Warden
212 F.2d 186 (Tenth Circuit, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
212 F.2d 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-looney-warden-ca10-1954.