Wright v. Laugenour

50 Cal. 556
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1875·No. No. 4865·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

By the Court:

Section 610 of the Code of Civil Procedure authorizes the District Court, in certain cases, to direct the jury to be conducted to view the property in controversy. It does not authorize the view of other property than that which is in litigation, and the court below properly refused the appellant’s application.

The instruction given to the jury before they proceeded to look at the land, did not authorize them to take into con[558]*558sideration—when they should retire to the jury-room—the result of their own examinations of the land, as independent evidence in the cause. In this respect the instruction differed from the charge of the court, held erroneous at the former appeal.

Judgment affirmed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. Laugenour, 50 Cal. 556 (Cal. 1875).

50 Cal. 556 (Wright v. Laugenour) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shifrin v. McGuire & Hester Construction Co.
239 Cal. App. 2d 420 (California Court of Appeal, 1966)
Noble v. Kertz & Sons Feed & Fuel Co.
164 P.2d 257 (California Court of Appeal, 1945)
Headington v. Central Building Co.
41 P.2d 1040 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1935)
Stanford v. Felt
16 P. 900 (California Supreme Court, 1886)