Wright v. Jeffrey

5 Cow. 15
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1825·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Curia.

The motion must be denied. It was not material whether the defendant had knowledge of the defect or not, when he put in special bail. Putting in bail would have warranted the plaintiff in proceeding without any process. 'The case is not within the statute, or the rule of public policy which forbids any ministerial act in the course of a cause to be performed on Sunday. It is probably a mere clerical mistake of the return day. It was taken for granted, however, by Vanderpoel v. Wright, (1 Cowen’s Rep. 209,) that -even m that case, which was the service of a capias on Sunday, an appearance would have cured the defect.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. Jeffrey, 5 Cow. 15 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1825).

5 Cow. 15 (Wright v. Jeffrey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Bank v. Spence
37 Misc. 854 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1902)
Graham v. Cass Circuit Judge
66 N.W. 348 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1896)
People ex rel. Lower v. Donovan
29 Abb. N. Cas. 172 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)
Kinney v. Emery
37 N.J. Eq. 339 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1883)
Jacobs v. Stevens
57 N.H. 610 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1876)
Ilsley v. Harris
10 Wis. 95 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1859)
Paulding v. Hudson Manufacturing Co.
2 E.D. Smith 38 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1851)