Paulding v. Hudson Manufacturing Co.

2 E.D. Smith 38
New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided April 15, 1851·Published

Opinion

By the Court. Woodruff, J.

Had not the defendants appeared and pleaded to the merits, it is clear that the justice would have had no jurisdiction.

A foreign corporation cannot be compelled to appear in a Justice’s Court. But such a corporation may voluntarily appear and submit themselves to the jurisdiction of that court, as well as any other, and if the court, in such case, have jurisdiction of the subject matter, its proceedings thereon will bind the defendants. By such appearance, therefore, and by answering to the merits, the defendants waived the objection which otherwise would have been fatal to the plaintiffs’ action. (Robinson v. West, 1 Sandf. Sup. Ct. R. 19, and cases cited; Smith v. Elder, 3 J. R. 105; 1 Cow. 209; Wright v. Jeffrey, 5 Cow. 15; Bixby v. Winchell, 8 Cow. 366; Allen v. Edwards, 3 Hill, 501; Burckle v. Eckhart, 3 Comst. 137.)

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paulding v. Hudson Manufacturing Co., 2 E.D. Smith 38 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1851).

2 E.D. Smith 38 (Paulding v. Hudson Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wright v. Jeffrey
5 Cow. 15 (New York Supreme Court, 1825)
Gallatian v. Cunningham
8 Cow. 361 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1826)