Paulding v. Hudson Manufacturing Co.

2 E.D. Smith 38
CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas
DecidedApril 15, 1851
StatusPublished

This text of 2 E.D. Smith 38 (Paulding v. Hudson Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paulding v. Hudson Manufacturing Co., 2 E.D. Smith 38 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1851).

Opinion

By the Court. Woodruff, J.

Had not the defendants appeared and pleaded to the merits, it is clear that the justice would have had no jurisdiction.

A foreign corporation cannot be compelled to appear in a Justice’s Court. But such a corporation may voluntarily appear and submit themselves to the jurisdiction of that court, as well as any other, and if the court, in such case, have jurisdiction of the subject matter, its proceedings thereon will bind the defendants. By such appearance, therefore, and by answering to the merits, the defendants waived the objection which otherwise would have been fatal to the plaintiffs’ action. (Robinson v. West, 1 Sandf. Sup. Ct. R. 19, and cases cited; Smith v. Elder, 3 J. R. 105; 1 Cow. 209; Wright v. Jeffrey, 5 Cow. 15; Bixby v. Winchell, 8 Cow. 366; Allen v. Edwards, 3 Hill, 501; Burckle v. Eckhart, 3 Comst. 137.)

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. Jeffrey
5 Cow. 15 (New York Supreme Court, 1825)
Gallatian v. Cunningham
8 Cow. 361 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1826)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 E.D. Smith 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paulding-v-hudson-manufacturing-co-nyctcompl-1851.